Face recognition has been one of the technologies used in various walks of the modern life. Facial recognition is used in the applications like security and defense, retail and marketing, healthcare and hospitality. Security and defense holds really a great altitude of usage of facial recognition in comparison with the other applications.
The origin
of facial recognition dates back to 1800s. As immediate as the camera was
invented, law enforcement started utilizing the potential of facial recognition
by recording the images of the criminals to identify repeated offenders.
Despite
such critical application, San Francisco decided to ban the usage of facial
recognition from May 2019. San Francisco is the first country in the world to impose
ban on facial recognition. Recently, the Government of Boston joined the list
by imposing ban on facial recognition.
There was a
situation where five watches were stolen from Shinola retail store, which were
of $3800 worth. As a part of investigation, the police collected the CCTV footage
and ran a facial recognition software with the person identified from the
footage. The software recognized the person as Robert Julian-Borchak Williams
(42 YO) hailing from Farmington Hills, Michigan. Finally, charges against
Williams were dropped off for the reason that the facial recognition software had
a false hit in identification.
In this
context, the city council of Boston voted to ban the use of such software. This
measure will reach the Mayor of Boston Marty Walsh. One of the sponsors of the
bill Councilor Ricardo Arroyo noted that the facial recognition software used
by the police is inaccurate for the people of color.
Apart from
this practical example of facial recognition software error, MIT has conducted
an analysis on understanding the accuracy of such software. This study revealed
that the error rate of light-skinned men is 0.8% and 34.7% that of dark-skinned
women.
 |
| Light-skinned man identified by Facial recognition software |
 |
| Dark-skinned woman identified by Facial recognition software |
It has an obvious racial bias and that's dangerous. But it also has sort of a chilling effect on civil liberties. And so, in a time where we're seeing so much direct action in the form of marches and protests for rights, any kind of surveillance technology that could be used to essentially chill free speech or ... more or less monitor activism or activists is dangerous.
The Boston
Police Commissioner William Gross said that the modern technology is not
reliable. In his words, “Until this technology is 100%, I'm not interested in
it. I didn’t forget that I'm African American and I can be misidentified as
well.”
Based on
the recent revolution against racism, William’s case is really alarming. Just
because of a software bug, he was accused and appeared in the court. In the era
of breaking all the inequalities, the software we learn, the algorithms
implemented in Machine Learning software and the application of such algorithms
should be designed enhanced care.
0 comments:
Post a Comment